Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce gagne (5,76 s vs 9,49 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Veloce | X2 sDrive18i F39 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s−3,73 s | 9,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s−2,76 s | 16,88 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s−5,03 s | 31,04 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+28 km/h | 202 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,37 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Veloce | X2 sDrive18i F39 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 3,25 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,12 s | 6,49 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s | 9,49 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,99 s | 13,54 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,32 s | 26,84 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,33 s | 89,98 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s | 16,88 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s | 31,04 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 202 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Stelvio Veloce 2024 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 220 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 410 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | X2 sDrive18i | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the Stelvio Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.76 s versus 9.49 s for the Bmw X2 sDrive18i. At this point, the Stelvio Veloce leads by 3.73 s and sits roughly 25 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Veloce is doing 129 km/h against 108 km/h for the Bmw X2 sDrive18i. The gap is 1.80 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Veloce crosses the line in 14.12 s versus 16.88 s. The 2.76 s gap represents roughly 98 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 149 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Veloce finishes in 26.01 s versus 31.04 s, with a 5.03 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Stelvio Veloce is capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw X2 sDrive18i at 205 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.59 kg/hp vs 10.37 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.03 seconds. The 3.73 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce gagne (5,76 s vs 9,49 s).
Stelvio Veloce passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,76 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Stelvio Veloce : 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp. X2 sDrive18i F39 : 136 hp, ratio 10,37 kg/hp.
Stelvio Veloce : 230 km/h. X2 sDrive18i F39 : 202 km/h.