Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 11,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Veloce | 216d F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s−5,47 s | 11,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s−4,09 s | 18,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s−6,64 s | 32,65 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+35 km/h | 195 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 12,24 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Veloce | 216d F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 2,82 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 4,62 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,12 s | 8,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s | 11,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,99 s | 15,50 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,32 s | 29,86 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,33 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s | 18,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s | 32,65 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 195 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 116 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 270 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 420 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the Stelvio Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.76 s versus 11.23 s for the Bmw 216d. At this point, the Stelvio Veloce leads by 5.47 s and sits roughly 42 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Veloce is doing 129 km/h against 105 km/h for the Bmw 216d. The gap is 2.97 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Veloce crosses the line in 14.12 s versus 18.21 s. The 4.09 s gap represents roughly 139 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 146 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Veloce finishes in 26.01 s versus 32.65 s, with a 6.64 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Stelvio Veloce is capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw 216d at 195 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.59 kg/hp vs 12.24 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 18.17 seconds. The 5.47 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 11,23 s).
Stelvio Veloce goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Stelvio Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp. 216d F22: 116 hp, ratio 12,24 kg/hp.
Stelvio Veloce: 230 km/h. 216d F22: 195 km/h.