Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 9,16 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Veloce | 218d Active Tourer F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s−3,40 s | 9,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s−2,70 s | 16,82 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s−4,36 s | 30,37 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+20 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,70 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Veloce | 218d Active Tourer F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 2,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 3,78 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,12 s | 6,59 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s | 9,16 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,99 s | 12,58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,32 s | 23,37 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,33 s | 52,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s | 16,82 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s | 30,37 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 455 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (8-speed Steptronic) |
Off the line, the Stelvio Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.76 s versus 9.16 s for the 218d Active Tourer. At this point, the Stelvio Veloce leads by 3.40 s and sits roughly 32 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Veloce is doing 129 km/h against 112 km/h for the 218d Active Tourer. The gap is 1.97 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Veloce crosses the line in 14.12 s versus 16.82 s. The 2.70 s gap represents roughly 100 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 155 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Veloce finishes in 26.01 s versus 30.37 s, with a 4.36 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Stelvio Veloce is capped at 230 km/h, the 218d Active Tourer at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.59 kg/hp vs 9.70 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.67 seconds. The 3.40 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce wins (5,76 s vs 9,16 s).
Stelvio Veloce goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Stelvio Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp. 218d Active Tourer F44: 150 hp, ratio 9,70 kg/hp.
Stelvio Veloce: 230 km/h. 218d Active Tourer F44: 210 km/h.