Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce gagne (5,76 s vs 6,47 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Stelvio Veloce | Macan 95B.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s−0,71 s | 6,47 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s−0,58 s | 14,70 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s−0,71 s | 26,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+1 km/h | 229 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,59 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,32 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Stelvio Veloce | Macan 95B.3 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 1,68 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 2,81 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,12 s | 4,68 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,76 s | 6,47 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,99 s | 8,70 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,32 s | 15,31 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 26,33 s | 27,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,12 s | 14,70 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s | 26,72 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 229 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 370 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Stelvio Veloce hits 100 km/h in 5.76 s versus 6.47 s for the Macan. At this point, the Stelvio Veloce leads by 0.71 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Veloce is doing 129 km/h against 127 km/h for the Macan. The gap is 0.51 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Veloce crosses the line in 14.12 s versus 14.70 s. The 0.58 s gap represents roughly 25 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Veloce continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Veloce finishes in 26.01 s versus 26.72 s, with a 0.71 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (230 vs 229 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Stelvio Veloce and the Macan are governed to 230 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.59 kg/hp vs 7.32 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.13 seconds. The 0.71 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Veloce gagne (5,76 s vs 6,47 s).
Stelvio Veloce passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,76 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Stelvio Veloce : 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp. Macan 95B.3 : 252 hp, ratio 7,32 kg/hp.
Stelvio Veloce : 230 km/h. Macan 95B.3 : 229 km/h.