Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 and A110 GT 300 are neck and neck (3,83 s vs 3,92 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 Competition F82 | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s−0,09 s | 3,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,61 s−0,36 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,89 s−0,87 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 272 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,38 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,65 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 Competition F82 | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 1,89 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,97 s | 3,06 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,92 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,79 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,46 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,33 s | 12,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,61 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,89 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 725 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 3.92 s for the A110 GT 300. The 0.09 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition is doing 163 km/h against 157 km/h for the A110 GT 300. The gap is 0.17 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 Competition crosses the line in 11.61 s versus 11.96 s. The 0.36 s gap represents roughly 19 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 215 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition finishes in 20.89 s versus 21.76 s, with a 0.87 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (272 km/h), the A110 GT 300 never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M4 Competition never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.38 kg/hp vs 3.65 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.79 seconds. The 0.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 and A110 GT 300 are neck and neck (3,83 s vs 3,92 s, no significant gap).
M4 Competition F82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 Competition F82: 510 hp, ratio 3,38 kg/hp. A110 GT 300: 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
M4 Competition F82: 250 km/h. A110 GT 300: 272 km/h.