Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,29 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model X Long Range | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,29 s | 3,92 s+0,38 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,14 s | 11,97 s+0,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,65 s−0,11 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 272 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,67 kg/hp | 3,65 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model X Long Range | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,28 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,13 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,42 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,29 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,30 s | 5,15 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,29 s | 8,21 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,64 s | 12,68 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 12,14 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,65 s | 21,76 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 660 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.30 s for the Model X Long Range. Despite lacking instant torque, 305 hp of power compensates. At this point, the A110 GT 300 leads by 0.38 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 158 km/h for the Model X Long Range. The gap is 0.22 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 12.14 s. The 0.18 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Model X Long Range maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h while the A110 GT 300 keeps accelerating towards 272 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.12 s.
Around 824 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Model X Long Range overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 22 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Model X Long Range finishes in 21.65 s versus 21.76 s. The 0.11 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Model X Long Range never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.92 seconds. The 0.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,29 s).
Model X Long Range goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,29 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model X Long Range: 670 hp, ratio 3,67 kg/hp. A110 GT 300: 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
Model X Long Range: 250 km/h. A110 GT 300: 272 km/h.