Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 S 292 gagne (3,93 s vs 5,74 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A110 S 292 | 530d Touring G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,93 s−1,81 s | 5,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,09 s−1,96 s | 14,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,16 s−3,60 s | 25,76 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 264 km/h+14 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,76 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,60 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A110 S 292 | 530d Touring G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,09 s | 1,29 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,83 s | 2,17 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,02 s | 4,01 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,93 s | 5,74 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,26 s | 7,93 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,57 s | 14,08 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,51 s | 24,25 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,09 s | 14,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,16 s | 25,76 s |
| Top speed limited | 264 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 296 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | A110 S 292 | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the A110 S 292 hits 100 km/h in 3.93 s versus 5.74 s for the Bmw 530d Touring. At this point, the A110 S 292 leads by 1.81 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 S 292 is doing 154 km/h against 129 km/h for the Bmw 530d Touring. The gap is 1.18 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 S 292 crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 14.04 s. The 1.96 s gap represents roughly 84 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the A110 S 292 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 210 km/h versus 179 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 S 292 finishes in 22.15 s versus 25.76 s, with a 3.60 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (264 vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 530d Touring never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.76 kg/hp vs 6.60 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.21 seconds. The 1.81 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 S 292 gagne (3,93 s vs 5,74 s).
A110 S 292 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,93 secondes (simulation calibrée).
A110 S 292 : 296 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp. 530d Touring G30 : 265 hp, ratio 6,60 kg/hp.
A110 S 292 : 264 km/h. 530d Touring G30 : 250 km/h.