Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ8 SUV gagne (4,03 s vs 4,93 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ8 SUV | Q8 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,03 s−0,90 s | 4,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s−1,07 s | 13,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,98 s−1,99 s | 23,97 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+10 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,42 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,94 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ8 SUV | Q8 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,29 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,89 s | 2,14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,06 s | 3,60 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,03 s | 4,93 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,25 s | 6,58 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,55 s | 11,10 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,50 s | 18,18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s | 13,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,98 s | 23,97 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 489 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 415 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the SQ8 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.03 s versus 4.93 s for the Q8 SUV. Despite lacking instant torque, 507 hp of power compensates. At this point, the SQ8 SUV leads by 0.90 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ8 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 140 km/h for the Q8 SUV. The gap is 0.68 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ8 SUV crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 13.18 s. The 1.07 s gap represents roughly 51 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ8 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 213 km/h versus 195 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ8 SUV finishes in 21.98 s versus 23.96 s, with a 1.99 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ8 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Q8 SUV at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.54 seconds. The 0.90 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ8 SUV gagne (4,03 s vs 4,93 s).
SQ8 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,03 secondes (simulation calibrée).
SQ8 SUV : 507 hp, ratio 4,42 kg/hp. Q8 SUV : 489 hp, ratio 4,94 kg/hp.
SQ8 SUV : 250 km/h. Q8 SUV : 240 km/h.