Over 0–100 km/h, SQ8 SUV wins (4,03 s vs 4,25 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X6 M50i G06 | SQ8 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,25 s | 4,03 s+0,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,12 s+0,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s | 21,98 s+0,16 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,23 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,42 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X6 M50i G06 | SQ8 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,25 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,06 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,27 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,25 s | 4,03 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,46 s | 5,25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,75 s | 8,55 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,66 s | 13,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s | 21,98 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp | 8 cyl |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the SQ8 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.03 s versus 4.26 s for the X6 M50i. At this point, the SQ8 SUV leads by 0.22 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ8 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 154 km/h for the X6 M50i. The gap is 0.18 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ8 SUV crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 12.29 s. The 0.18 s gap represents roughly 9 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the SQ8 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 213 km/h versus 214 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ8 SUV finishes in 21.98 s versus 22.14 s, with a 0.16 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the X6 M50i and the SQ8 SUV are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.23 kg/hp vs 4.42 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.19 seconds. The 0.22 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ8 SUV wins (4,03 s vs 4,25 s).
X6 M50i G06 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,25 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X6 M50i G06: 530 hp, ratio 4,23 kg/hp. SQ8 SUV: 507 hp, ratio 4,42 kg/hp.
X6 M50i G06: 250 km/h. SQ8 SUV: 250 km/h.