Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback gagne (3,88 s vs 8,14 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 3 Sportback | 420i Convertible G22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s−4,27 s | 8,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s−3,89 s | 15,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s−6,92 s | 28,97 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+14 km/h | 236 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,18 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 3 Sportback | 420i Convertible G22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,04 s | 1,81 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,74 s | 3,07 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,85 s | 5,69 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s | 8,14 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,07 s | 11,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,84 s | 20,26 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,81 s | 36,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 15,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s | 28,97 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 236 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 565 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 690 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 420i Convertible | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the RS 3 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 8.14 s for the Bmw 420i Convertible. At this point, the RS 3 Sportback leads by 4.27 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 3 Sportback is doing 150 km/h against 115 km/h for the Bmw 420i Convertible. The gap is 2.59 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 3 Sportback crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 15.96 s. The 3.88 s gap represents roughly 145 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 3 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 211 km/h versus 161 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 3 Sportback finishes in 22.04 s versus 28.97 s, with a 6.92 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 236 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS 3 Sportback is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 420i Convertible at 236 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.91 kg/hp vs 9.18 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.10 seconds. The 4.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback gagne (3,88 s vs 8,14 s).
RS 3 Sportback passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,88 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS 3 Sportback : 400 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp. 420i Convertible G22 : 184 hp, ratio 9,18 kg/hp.
RS 3 Sportback : 250 km/h. 420i Convertible G22 : 236 km/h.