Over 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback wins (3,88 s vs 5,44 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 3 Sportback | 530d xDrive G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s−1,56 s | 5,44 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s−1,68 s | 13,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s−3,11 s | 25,16 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,40 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 3 Sportback | 530d xDrive G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,04 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,74 s | 2,13 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,85 s | 3,83 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s | 5,44 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,07 s | 7,45 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,84 s | 13,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,81 s | 21,96 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 13,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,05 s | 25,16 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 565 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 695 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the RS 3 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 5.44 s for the Bmw 530d xDrive. At this point, the RS 3 Sportback leads by 1.56 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 3 Sportback is doing 150 km/h against 132 km/h for the Bmw 530d xDrive. The gap is 1.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 3 Sportback crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 13.76 s. The 1.68 s gap represents roughly 74 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 3 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 211 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 3 Sportback finishes in 22.04 s versus 25.16 s, with a 3.11 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS 3 Sportback and the Bmw 530d xDrive are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.91 kg/hp vs 6.40 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.63 seconds. The 1.56 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sportback wins (3,88 s vs 5,44 s).
RS 3 Sportback goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,88 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS 3 Sportback: 400 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp. 530d xDrive G30: 265 hp, ratio 6,40 kg/hp.
RS 3 Sportback: 250 km/h. 530d xDrive G30: 250 km/h.