Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
ARSBEVvsB220dDiesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsRS · 220d

Audi RS e-tron GT vs BMW 220d Gran Tourer F44: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2022 vs 2020 · Methodology
AudiBEVFaster

RS e-tron GT

738 hp · 830 Nm · 2,395 kg · 2022

VS
BMWDiesel

220d Gran Tourer F44

190 hp · 400 Nm · 1,560 kg · 2020

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi RS e-tron GT

3.34 s

Gap4.79 sin favour of RS e-tron GT
BBMW 220d Gran Tourer F44

8.13 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureRS e-tron GT220d Gran Tourer F44Gap
0–100 km/h3.34 s8.13 s4.79 s · RS e-tron GT
400 m standing start11.17 s16.00 s4.83 s · RS e-tron GT
1,000 m standing start20.27 s29.05 s8.78 s · RS e-tron GT
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h218 km/h32 km/h · RS e-tron GT
Power-to-weight ratio3.25 kg/hp8.21 kg/hpbetter ratio · RS e-tron GT

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiBEVRS e-tron GT
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWDiesel220d Gran Tourer F44
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageRS e-tron GT220d Gran Tourer F44
0–30 km/h0.98 s2.00 s
0–50 km/h1.64 s3.23 s
0–80 km/h2.63 s5.75 s
0–100 km/h3.34 s8.13 s
0–120 km/h4.24 s11.09 s
0–160 km/h6.79 s20.31 s
0–200 km/h10.40 s42.20 s
400 m standing start11.17 s16.00 s
1,000 m standing start20.27 s29.05 s
Top speed limited250 km/h218 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

RS e-tron GT

3,25kg/hpratio better by 4,97 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power738 hpPending
Torque830 Nm
Weight2 395 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
BMW

220d Gran Tourer F44

8,21kg/hpcompensated by −835 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power190 hp4 cyl
Torque400 Nm
Weight1 560 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox8-speed Steptronic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.34 s versus 8.13 s for the 220d Gran Tourer. The instant torque of 830 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 4.79 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 167 km/h against 117 km/h for the 220d Gran Tourer. The gap is 3.17 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.17 s versus 16.00 s. The 4.83 s gap represents roughly 178 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the RS e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 161 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS e-tron GT finishes in 20.27 s versus 29.05 s, with a 8.78 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS e-tron GT is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the 220d Gran Tourer at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.91 seconds. The 4.79 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

RS e-tron GT vs M5 Touring

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC (long) vs 220d Gran Tourer

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan Turbo S vs RS e-tron GT

MercedesVSBMW

V 300 d 4MATIC vs 220d Gran Tourer

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,34 s vs 8,13 s).

RS e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,34 seconds (calibrated simulation).

RS e-tron GT: 738 hp, ratio 3,25 kg/hp. 220d Gran Tourer F44: 190 hp, ratio 8,21 kg/hp.

RS e-tron GT: 250 km/h. 220d Gran Tourer F44: 218 km/h.