Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
ARSBEVvsB330ePHEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsRS · 330e

Audi RS e-tron GT vs BMW 330e G20: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2022 vs 2021 · Methodology
AudiBEVFaster

RS e-tron GT

738 hp · 830 Nm · 2,395 kg · 2022

VS
BMWPHEV

330e G20

292 hp · 420 Nm · 1,770 kg · 2021

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi RS e-tron GT

3.34 s

Gap2.57 sin favour of RS e-tron GT
BBMW 330e G20

5.91 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureRS e-tron GT330e G20Gap
0–100 km/h3.34 s5.91 s2.57 s · RS e-tron GT
400 m standing start11.17 s14.10 s2.93 s · RS e-tron GT
1,000 m standing start20.27 s25.24 s4.97 s · RS e-tron GT
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h230 km/h20 km/h · RS e-tron GT
Power-to-weight ratio3.25 kg/hp6.06 kg/hpbetter ratio · RS e-tron GT

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiBEVRS e-tron GT
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWPHEV330e G20
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageRS e-tron GT330e G20
0–30 km/h0.98 s1.62 s
0–50 km/h1.64 s2.70 s
0–80 km/h2.63 s4.39 s
0–100 km/h3.34 s5.91 s
0–120 km/h4.24 s7.80 s
0–160 km/h6.79 s12.96 s
0–200 km/h10.40 s20.88 s
400 m standing start11.17 s14.10 s
1,000 m standing start20.27 s25.24 s
Top speed limited250 km/h230 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

RS e-tron GT

3,25kg/hpratio better by 2,82 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power738 hpPending
Torque830 Nm
Weight2 395 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
BMW

330e G20

6,06kg/hpcompensated by −625 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power292 hpPending
Torque420 Nm
Weight1 770 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox8-speed Steptronic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.34 s versus 5.91 s for the 330e. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 2.57 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 167 km/h against 134 km/h for the 330e. The gap is 2.00 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.17 s versus 14.09 s. The 2.93 s gap represents roughly 128 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the RS e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 188 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS e-tron GT finishes in 20.27 s versus 25.24 s, with a 4.97 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS e-tron GT is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the 330e at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.25 kg/hp vs 6.06 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.90 seconds. The 2.57 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

RS e-tron GT vs M5 Touring

AudiVSBMW

A5 Avant e-hybrid quattro 220 kW vs 330e

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan Turbo S vs RS e-tron GT

AudiVSBMW

A5 Limousine e-hybrid quattro 220 kW vs 330e

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,34 s vs 5,91 s).

RS e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,34 seconds (calibrated simulation).

RS e-tron GT: 738 hp, ratio 3,25 kg/hp. 330e G20: 292 hp, ratio 6,06 kg/hp.

RS e-tron GT: 250 km/h. 330e G20: 230 km/h.