Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,34 s vs 4,33 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | RS e-tron GT | Model 3 Long Range AWD | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.34 s | 4.33 s | 0.99 s · RS e-tron GT |
| 400 m standing start | 11.17 s | 12.67 s | 1.50 s · RS e-tron GT |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.27 s | 23.21 s | 2.94 s · RS e-tron GT |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 233 km/h | 17 km/h · RS e-tron GT |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.25 kg/hp | 5.12 kg/hp | better ratio · RS e-tron GT |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | RS e-tron GT | Model 3 Long Range AWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0.98 s | 1.17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.64 s | 1.95 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.63 s | 3.20 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.34 s | 4.33 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4.24 s | 5.75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6.79 s | 10.09 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10.40 s | 16.69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11.17 s | 12.67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20.27 s | 23.21 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 233 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 738 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 611 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 844 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.34 s versus 4.33 s for the Model 3 Long Range AWD. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 0.99 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 167 km/h against 145 km/h for the Model 3 Long Range AWD. The gap is 0.88 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.17 s versus 12.66 s. The 1.50 s gap represents roughly 72 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 199 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS e-tron GT finishes in 20.27 s versus 23.21 s, with a 2.94 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS e-tron GT is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Model 3 Long Range AWD at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.25 kg/hp vs 5.12 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.64 seconds. The 0.99 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,34 s vs 4,33 s).
RS e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,34 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS e-tron GT: 738 hp, ratio 3,25 kg/hp. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 360 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp.
RS e-tron GT: 250 km/h. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 233 km/h.