Over 0–100 km/h, RS6 Performance Avant wins (3,46 s vs 3,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS6 Performance Avant | M4 Competition F82 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,46 s−0,37 s | 3,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,31 s−0,30 s | 11,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,37 s−0,52 s | 20,89 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 346 km/h+96 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,45 kg/hp | 3,38 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS6 Performance Avant | M4 Competition F82 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,99 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,65 s | 1,88 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,63 s | 2,97 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,46 s | 3,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,45 s | 4,79 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,06 s | 7,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,72 s | 11,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,31 s | 11,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,37 s | 20,89 s |
| Top speed limited | 346 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 630 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 850 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 175 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 725 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
Off the line, the RS6 Performance Avant hits 100 km/h in 3.46 s versus 3.83 s for the Bmw M4 Competition. At this point, the RS6 Performance Avant leads by 0.37 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS6 Performance Avant is doing 165 km/h against 163 km/h for the Bmw M4 Competition. The gap is 0.27 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS6 Performance Avant crosses the line in 11.30 s versus 11.61 s. The 0.30 s gap represents roughly 17 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the RS6 Performance Avant continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 227 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS6 Performance Avant finishes in 20.37 s versus 20.89 s, with a 0.52 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M4 Competition never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.45 kg/hp vs 3.38 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.36 seconds. The 0.37 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS6 Performance Avant wins (3,46 s vs 3,83 s).
RS6 Performance Avant goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,46 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS6 Performance Avant: 630 hp, ratio 3,45 kg/hp. M4 Competition F82: 510 hp, ratio 3,38 kg/hp.
RS6 Performance Avant: 346 km/h. M4 Competition F82: 250 km/h.