Sur 0–100 km/h, RS6 Performance Avant gagne (3,46 s vs 3,74 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS6 Performance Avant | F-TYPE R P575 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,46 s−0,28 s | 3,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,31 s−0,21 s | 11,52 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,37 s−0,33 s | 20,70 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 346 km/h+46 km/h | 300 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,45 kg/hp | 3,03 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS6 Performance Avant | F-TYPE R P575 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,99 s | 1,10 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,65 s | 1,83 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,63 s | 2,99 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,46 s | 3,74 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,45 s | 4,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,06 s | 7,30 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,72 s | 11,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,31 s | 11,52 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,37 s | 20,70 s |
| Top speed | 346 km/h | 300 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 630 hp | |
| Torque | 850 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 175 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp | |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the RS6 Performance Avant hits 100 km/h in 3.46 s versus 3.74 s for the F-TYPE R P575. At this point, the RS6 Performance Avant leads by 0.28 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS6 Performance Avant is doing 165 km/h against 165 km/h for the F-TYPE R P575. The gap is 0.21 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS6 Performance Avant crosses the line in 11.30 s versus 11.52 s. The 0.22 s gap represents roughly 12 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the RS6 Performance Avant continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 230 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS6 Performance Avant finishes in 20.37 s versus 20.70 s, with a 0.33 s lead.
Electronically capped at 300 km/h, the F-TYPE R P575 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.45 kg/hp vs 3.03 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.27 seconds. The 0.28 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS6 Performance Avant gagne (3,46 s vs 3,74 s).
RS6 Performance Avant passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,46 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS6 Performance Avant : 630 hp, ratio 3,45 kg/hp. F-TYPE R P575 : 575 hp, ratio 3,03 kg/hp.
RS6 Performance Avant : 346 km/h. F-TYPE R P575 : 300 km/h.