Over 0–100 km/h, S3 Sedan wins (4,63 s vs 7,03 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| S3 Sedan | Clio 3 RS 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,63 s−2,40 s | 7,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,08 s−2,12 s | 15,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,69 s−3,54 s | 27,23 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+27 km/h | 223 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,61 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,20 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | S3 Sedan | Clio 3 RS 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,20 s | 2,02 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,00 s | 3,14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,37 s | 5,44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,63 s | 7,03 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,64 s | 9,53 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,96 s | 16,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,37 s | 27,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,08 s | 15,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,69 s | 27,23 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 215 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual close-ratio |
Off the line, the S3 Sedan hits 100 km/h in 4.63 s versus 7.03 s for the Clio 3 RS 200. At this point, the S3 Sedan leads by 2.40 s and sits roughly 25 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the S3 Sedan is doing 138 km/h against 125 km/h for the Clio 3 RS 200. The gap is 1.62 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the S3 Sedan crosses the line in 13.08 s versus 15.20 s. The 2.12 s gap represents roughly 89 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the S3 Sedan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the S3 Sedan finishes in 23.69 s versus 27.23 s, with a 3.54 s lead.
The S3 Sedan features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Clio 3 RS 200’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S3 Sedan is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Clio 3 RS 200 at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.61 kg/hp vs 6.20 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.83 seconds. The 2.40 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, S3 Sedan wins (4,63 s vs 7,03 s).
S3 Sedan goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
S3 Sedan: 333 hp, ratio 4,61 kg/hp. Clio 3 RS 200: 200 hp, ratio 6,20 kg/hp.
S3 Sedan: 250 km/h. Clio 3 RS 200: 223 km/h.