Over 0–100 km/h, Cooper S FWD wins (6,56 s vs 7,03 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Cooper S FWD | Clio 3 RS 200 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.56 s | 7.03 s | 0.47 s · Cooper S FWD |
| 400 m standing start | 14.62 s | 15.20 s | 0.58 s · Cooper S FWD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.03 s | 27.23 s | 1.20 s · Cooper S FWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 223 km/h | 27 km/h · Cooper S FWD |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.86 kg/hp | 6.20 kg/hp | better ratio · Cooper S FWD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Cooper S FWD | Clio 3 RS 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.88 s · tight gap | 2.02 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.14 s | 3.14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.99 s | 5.44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.56 s | 7.03 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.41 s | 9.53 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13.79 s | 16.04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22.98 s | 27.75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.62 s | 15.20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26.03 s | 27.23 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 223 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 195 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DCT |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 215 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual close-ratio |
Off the line, the Cooper S FWD hits 100 km/h in 6.56 s versus 7.03 s for the Clio 3 RS 200. At this point, the Cooper S FWD leads by 0.47 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cooper S FWD is doing 132 km/h against 125 km/h for the Clio 3 RS 200. The gap is 0.35 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cooper S FWD crosses the line in 14.62 s versus 15.20 s. The 0.58 s gap represents roughly 25 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Cooper S FWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cooper S FWD finishes in 26.02 s versus 27.23 s, with a 1.20 s lead.
Electronically capped at 223 km/h, the Clio 3 RS 200 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.86 kg/hp vs 6.20 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.83 seconds. The 0.47 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cooper S FWD wins (6,56 s vs 7,03 s).
Cooper S FWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,56 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cooper S FWD: 204 hp, ratio 5,86 kg/hp. Clio 3 RS 200: 200 hp, ratio 6,20 kg/hp.
Cooper S FWD: 250 km/h. Clio 3 RS 200: 223 km/h.