Over 0–100 km/h, S3 Sportback wins (4,64 s vs 6,65 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| S3 Sportback | Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,64 s−2,01 s | 6,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,09 s−1,67 s | 14,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,72 s−2,99 s | 26,71 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+19 km/h | 231 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,61 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,64 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | S3 Sportback | Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,23 s | 1,73 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,05 s | 2,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,41 s | 4,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,64 s | 6,65 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,63 s | 8,67 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,91 s | 15,01 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,45 s | 27,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,09 s | 14,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,72 s | 26,71 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 231 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | EDC 6-speed (dual clutch) |
Off the line, the S3 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 4.64 s versus 6.65 s for the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220. At this point, the S3 Sportback leads by 2.01 s and sits roughly 19 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the S3 Sportback is doing 139 km/h against 127 km/h for the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220. The gap is 1.19 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the S3 Sportback crosses the line in 13.08 s versus 14.76 s. The 1.67 s gap represents roughly 71 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the S3 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 176 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the S3 Sportback finishes in 23.72 s versus 26.71 s, with a 2.99 s lead.
The S3 Sportback features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S3 Sportback is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Clio 4 RS Trophy 220 at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.61 kg/hp vs 5.64 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.16 seconds. The 2.01 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, S3 Sportback wins (4,64 s vs 6,65 s).
S3 Sportback goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,64 seconds (calibrated simulation).
S3 Sportback: 333 hp, ratio 4,61 kg/hp. Clio 4 RS Trophy 220: 220 hp, ratio 5,64 kg/hp.
S3 Sportback: 250 km/h. Clio 4 RS Trophy 220: 231 km/h.