Over 0–100 km/h, S5 Sedan and SQ5 SUV are neck and neck (4,42 s vs 4,50 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| S5 Sedan | SQ5 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,50 s | 4,42 s+0,08 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,80 s | 12,76 s+0,04 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,39 s−0,11 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,31 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | S5 Sedan | SQ5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,11 s | 1,06 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,85 s | 1,78 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,22 s | 3,15 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,50 s | 4,42 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,11 s | 6,02 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,43 s | 10,50 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,98 s | 17,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,80 s | 12,76 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,39 s | 23,50 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 950 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 4.50 s for the S5 Sedan. The 0.08 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 SUV is doing 142 km/h against 142 km/h for the S5 Sedan. The gap is 0.07 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 SUV crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 12.80 s. The 0.04 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory - both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.12 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere - range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the S5 Sedan and the SQ5 SUV are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.31 kg/hp vs 5.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.04 seconds. The 0.08 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, S5 Sedan and SQ5 SUV are neck and neck (4,42 s vs 4,50 s, no significant gap).
S5 Sedan goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,50 seconds (calibrated simulation).
S5 Sedan: 367 hp, ratio 5,31 kg/hp. SQ5 SUV: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp.
S5 Sedan: 250 km/h. SQ5 SUV: 250 km/h.