Over 0–100 km/h, A110 S 292 wins (3,93 s vs 4,42 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ5 Sportback | A110 S 292 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 3,93 s+0,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s | 12,09 s+0,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s | 22,16 s+1,34 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 264 km/h−14 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,56 kg/hp | 3,76 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ5 Sportback | A110 S 292 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,09 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 1,83 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,15 s | 3,02 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 3,93 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,02 s | 5,26 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,50 s | 8,57 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,55 s | 13,51 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s | 12,09 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s | 22,16 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 264 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 296 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 S 292 hits 100 km/h in 3.93 s versus 4.42 s for the SQ5 Sportback. The 0.49 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the A110 S 292 is doing 154 km/h against 142 km/h for the SQ5 Sportback. The gap is 0.33 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 S 292 crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 12.76 s. The 0.67 s gap represents roughly 32 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the A110 S 292 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 210 km/h versus 196 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 S 292 finishes in 22.15 s versus 23.50 s, with a 1.35 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 264 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the SQ5 Sportback never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.56 kg/hp vs 3.76 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.96 seconds. The 0.49 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 S 292 wins (3,93 s vs 4,42 s).
SQ5 Sportback goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,42 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ5 Sportback: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp. A110 S 292: 296 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp.
SQ5 Sportback: 250 km/h. A110 S 292: 264 km/h.