SQ5 Sportback
367 hp, 4,5 s 0-100 : among the 3 D-SUV 2024–2028, the SQ5 Sportback ranks 0–100 km/h, Top speed, Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
367hp
550 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.5s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
8.7L
/100 km
Tank
65L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Audi SQ5 Sportback
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 2,995 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 367 hp |
| Couple | 550 Nm |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 8,7 L/100km |
| Tank | 65 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,5 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,717 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,823 mm |
| Width | 1,900 mm |
| Height | 1,619 mm |
| Boot | 470 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,040 kg |
| Cd | 0.34 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 198 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 3 D-SUV, the SQ5 Sportback ranks in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 0–100 km/h (4.5 s). 0–100 km/h (4.5 s).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 8,7 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Top speed, the Cupra Terramar VZ (1st with 250 km/h) takes the lead. If the priority is Power-to-weight, the Cupra Terramar VZ (1st with 180 hp/t) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.5 s 0-100 (0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the SQ5 Sportback ranks 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Audi SQ5 Sportback (4.5 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 250 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the SQ5 Sportback stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 3 D-SUV marketed between 2024–2028.
0–100 km/h
1eout of 3
Top speed
2eout of 3
Power-to-weight
2eout of 3
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
X3 M40i
360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
X3 M40i
360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
X4 M40i
360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
Macan GTS
360 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Audi SQ5 FY range
Generation FY launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the FY
Compare
Popular duels involving the SQ5 Sportback
Take the next step
Find a SQ5 Sportback or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Audi SQ5 Sportback: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 3 D-SUV 2024–2028, the SQ5 Sportback ranks 0–100 km/h (4.5 s, behind the Audi SQ5 Sportback), Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Cupra Terramar VZ), Power-to-weight (180 hp/t, behind the Cupra Terramar VZ).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.