Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ8 SUV gagne (4,03 s vs 6,89 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ8 SUV | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,03 s−2,86 s | 6,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s−2,88 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,98 s−5,74 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+24 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,42 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,44 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ8 SUV | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,30 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,89 s | 2,31 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,06 s | 4,66 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,03 s | 6,89 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,25 s | 9,75 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,55 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,50 s | 33,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s | 15,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,98 s | 27,72 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the SQ8 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.03 s versus 6.89 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the SQ8 SUV leads by 2.86 s and sits roughly 12 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ8 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 119 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 1.68 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ8 SUV crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 15.00 s. The 2.88 s gap represents roughly 113 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ8 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 213 km/h versus 165 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ8 SUV finishes in 21.98 s versus 27.71 s, with a 5.74 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ8 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.42 kg/hp vs 9.44 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.45 seconds. The 2.86 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ8 SUV gagne (4,03 s vs 6,89 s).
SQ8 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,03 secondes (simulation calibrée).
SQ8 SUV : 507 hp, ratio 4,42 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 231 hp, ratio 9,44 kg/hp.
SQ8 SUV : 250 km/h. Q7 SUV : 226 km/h.