Sur 0–100 km/h, 125d F20LCI gagne (6,48 s vs 7,03 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 125d F20LCI | Clio 3 RS 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,48 s−0,55 s | 7,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,68 s−0,52 s | 15,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,40 s−0,83 s | 27,23 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+17 km/h | 223 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,61 kg/hp | 6,20 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 125d F20LCI | Clio 3 RS 200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,88 s | 2,02 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,03 s | 3,14 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,83 s | 5,44 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,48 s | 7,03 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,57 s | 9,53 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,58 s | 16,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 25,23 s | 27,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,68 s | 15,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,40 s | 27,23 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 223 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 125d | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 215 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual close-ratio |
Off the line, the Bmw 125d hits 100 km/h in 6.48 s versus 7.03 s for the Clio 3 RS 200. At this point, the Bmw 125d leads by 0.55 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 125d is doing 130 km/h against 125 km/h for the Clio 3 RS 200. The gap is 0.40 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 125d crosses the line in 14.67 s versus 15.20 s. The 0.52 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 125d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 180 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 125d finishes in 26.39 s versus 27.23 s, with a 0.83 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 125d is capped at 240 km/h, the Clio 3 RS 200 at 223 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.61 kg/hp vs 6.20 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.83 seconds. The 0.55 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 125d F20LCI gagne (6,48 s vs 7,03 s).
125d F20LCI passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,48 secondes (simulation calibrée).
125d F20LCI : 224 hp, ratio 6,61 kg/hp. Clio 3 RS 200 : 200 hp, ratio 6,20 kg/hp.
125d F20LCI : 240 km/h. Clio 3 RS 200 : 223 km/h.