Sur 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 gagne (6,27 s vs 7,61 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 128ti F40 | 220d F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,27 s−1,34 s | 7,61 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,44 s−1,23 s | 15,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s−2,35 s | 28,22 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+15 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,92 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 128ti F40 | 220d F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,81 s | 2,11 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,01 s | 3,29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,76 s | 5,53 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,27 s | 7,61 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,20 s | 10,30 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,63 s | 18,15 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 22,97 s | 33,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,44 s | 15,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 28,22 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 445 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 128ti | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 505 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 220d | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 128ti hits 100 km/h in 6.27 s versus 7.61 s for the Bmw 220d. At this point, the Bmw 128ti leads by 1.34 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 128ti is doing 132 km/h against 120 km/h for the Bmw 220d. The gap is 0.75 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 128ti crosses the line in 14.44 s versus 15.67 s. The 1.23 s gap represents roughly 50 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 128ti continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 168 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 128ti finishes in 25.86 s versus 28.21 s, with a 2.35 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 128ti is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 220d at 235 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.45 kg/hp vs 7.92 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.91 seconds. The 1.34 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 128ti F40 gagne (6,27 s vs 7,61 s).
128ti F40 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,27 secondes (simulation calibrée).
128ti F40 : 265 hp, ratio 5,45 kg/hp. 220d F44 : 190 hp, ratio 7,92 kg/hp.
128ti F40 : 250 km/h. 220d F44 : 235 km/h.