Over 0–100 km/h, 320i G20 wins (7,05 s vs 8,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 320i G20 | 218d xDrive F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,05 s−1,87 s | 8,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,12 s−1,55 s | 16,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,81 s−2,28 s | 30,09 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 234 km/h+25 km/h | 209 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,93 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,13 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 320i G20 | 218d xDrive F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 2,34 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,44 s | 3,76 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,84 s | 6,39 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,05 s | 8,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,85 s | 12,25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,13 s | 22,61 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 33,99 s | 48,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,12 s | 16,67 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,81 s | 30,09 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h | 209 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 460 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 520 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (8-speed Steptronic) |
Off the line, the Bmw 320i hits 100 km/h in 7.05 s versus 8.92 s for the Bmw 218d xDrive. At this point, the Bmw 320i leads by 1.87 s and sits roughly 28 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320i is doing 119 km/h against 113 km/h for the Bmw 218d xDrive. The gap is 1.27 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320i crosses the line in 15.11 s versus 16.67 s. The 1.56 s gap represents roughly 59 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 166 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320i finishes in 27.81 s versus 30.09 s, with a 2.28 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 320i is capped at 235 km/h, the Bmw 218d xDrive at 209 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.93 kg/hp vs 10.13 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.27 seconds. The 1.87 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 320i G20 wins (7,05 s vs 8,92 s).
320i G20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,05 seconds (calibrated simulation).
320i G20: 184 hp, ratio 7,93 kg/hp. 218d xDrive F22: 150 hp, ratio 10,13 kg/hp.
320i G20: 234 km/h. 218d xDrive F22: 209 km/h.