G20 · GENERATION 2019 · SALOON
BMWICE

320i

184 hp, 7,1 s 0-100 : among the 80 saloons 2017–2021, the 320i ranks 32th of 80 in Combined consumption, 20th of 72 in Tank range, 45th of 80 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,52215,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

184hp

300 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.1s

VMax 235 km/h

Cons.

5.9L

/100 km

Tank

59L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 320i

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement1,998 cm\u00b3
Power184 hp
Couple300 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
Transmission320i

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5,9 L/100km
Tank59 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,1 s
VMax235 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,709 mm
Wheelbase2,851 mm
Width1,827 mm
Height1,435 mm
Boot480 L
Kerb weight1,460 kg
Cd0.25
CO₂ WLTP134 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 80 saloons, the 320i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 20th of 72 in Tank range (1000 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.9 L/100 L/100 (32th of 80 in Combined consumption)

The 320i consumes 5.9 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 420d (4.2 L/100).

Tank range: 1000 km (20th of 72 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 320i covers 1000 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 320i stands against saloons

Comparison across 80 saloons marketed between 2017–2021.

Combined consumption

32eout of 80

5.9 L/100
Min12.7 L/100 · Ford Mustang GT S550 450
Max4.2 L/100 · Bmw 420d

Tank range

20eout of 72

1 000 km
Min480 km · Ford Mustang GT S550 450
Max1 405 km · Bmw 420d

0–100 km/h

45eout of 80

7,1 s
Min8,9 s · Bmw 318d Touring
Max3,9 s · Bmw M4 Competition Coupe

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 3 Series G20 range

Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G20

Compare

Popular duels involving the 320i

Take the next step

Find a 320i or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW 320i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the 320i rank in its segment?#

Among the 80 saloons 2017–2021, the 320i ranks 32th of 80 in Combined consumption (5.9 L/100, behind the Bmw 420d), 20th of 72 in Tank range (1000 km, behind the Bmw 420d), 45th of 80 in 0–100 km/h (7.1 s, behind the Bmw M4 Competition Coupe).

What is the range of the 320i?#

1000 km on a full tank (5.9 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 20th of 72 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the 320i cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw 420d instead?#

The Bmw 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 5.9 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320i vs Bmw 420d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.