Over 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 wins (7,03 s vs 9,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 320d G20 | 218i Active Tourer F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,03 s−2,33 s | 9,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,13 s−1,77 s | 16,90 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,24 s−3,49 s | 30,73 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+35 km/h | 205 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,63 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,07 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 320d G20 | 218i Active Tourer F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,81 s | 2,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,00 s | 3,62 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,11 s | 6,58 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,03 s | 9,36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,49 s | 13,00 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,32 s | 24,95 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,13 s | 66,97 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,13 s | 16,90 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,24 s | 30,73 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 205 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 450 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 220 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 370 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed Steptronic with double clutch) |
Off the line, the Bmw 320d hits 100 km/h in 7.03 s versus 9.36 s for the Bmw 218i Active Tourer. At this point, the Bmw 320d leads by 2.33 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d is doing 123 km/h against 110 km/h for the Bmw 218i Active Tourer. The gap is 1.12 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d crosses the line in 15.13 s versus 16.89 s. The 1.77 s gap represents roughly 65 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 173 km/h versus 152 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d finishes in 27.23 s versus 30.73 s, with a 3.49 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 320d is capped at 240 km/h, the Bmw 218i Active Tourer at 205 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.63 kg/hp vs 10.07 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.28 seconds. The 2.33 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 wins (7,03 s vs 9,36 s).
320d G20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,03 seconds (calibrated simulation).
320d G20: 190 hp, ratio 7,63 kg/hp. 218i Active Tourer F44: 136 hp, ratio 10,07 kg/hp.
320d G20: 240 km/h. 218i Active Tourer F44: 205 km/h.