Among the 83 saloons 2017–2021, the 320d ranks 11th of 83 in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100, behind the Bmw 420d), 47th of 75 in Tank range (851 km, behind the Bmw 420d), 51th of 83 in 0–100 km/h (7.1 s, behind the Bmw M3 Competition).
G20 · GENERATION 2019 → · SALOON
BMWICE
320d
190 hp, 7,1 s 0-100 : among the 83 saloons 2017–2021, the 320d ranks 11th of 83 in Combined consumption, 47th of 75 in Tank range, 51th of 83 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
190hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.1s
VMax 240 km/h
Cons.
4.7L
/100 km
Tank
40L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW 320d
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Power | 190 hp |
| Couple | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 4.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,1 s |
| VMax | 240 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,709 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,851 mm |
| Width | 1,827 mm |
| Height | 1,435 mm |
| Boot | 480 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,450 kg |
| Cd | 0.23 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 122 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 83 saloons, the 320d ranks (top 11 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 11th of 83 in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.7 L/100 L/100 (11th of 83 in Combined consumption)
The 320d consumes 4.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 851 km (47th of 75 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 320d covers 851 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 320d stands against saloons
Comparison across 83 saloons marketed between 2017–2021.
Combined consumption11e / 83
4.7 L/100
Min 12.7 L/100 · Ford Mustang GT S550 450Max 4.2 L/100 · Bmw 420d
Tank range47e / 75
851 km
Min 480 km · Ford Mustang GT S550 450Max 1 405 km · Bmw 420d
0–100 km/h51e / 83
7,1 s
Min 8,9 s · Bmw 318d TouringMax 3,9 s · Bmw M3 Competition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
A4 40 TDI190 hp · 0-100 7.7 s
S60 B4197 hp · 0-100 8.0 s
A5 Avant204 hp · 0-100 6.9 s
A5 Sedan204 hp · 0-100 7.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW 3 Series G20 range
Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G20
Compare
Popular duels involving the 320d
Frequently asked questions
BMW 320d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
851 km on a full tank (4.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 47th of 75 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 4.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320d vs Bmw 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.