Sur 0–100 km/h, 225xe iPerformance F44 gagne (6,80 s vs 6,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 225xe iPerformance F44 | 320d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,80 s−0,03 s | 6,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,96 s | 14,96 s+0,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,93 s−0,67 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 202 km/h | 240 km/h−38 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,17 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,11 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 225xe iPerformance F44 | 320d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,85 s | 1,25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,08 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,03 s | 4,65 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,80 s | 6,83 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,05 s | 9,65 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,59 s | 17,86 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 27,34 s | 32,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,96 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,93 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed | 202 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 605 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 225xe iPerformance hits 100 km/h in 6.80 s versus 6.83 s for the Bmw 320d. The instant torque of 385 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.03 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d is doing 120 km/h against 126 km/h for the Bmw 225xe iPerformance. The gap is 0.30 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d crosses the line in 14.95 s versus 14.96 s. The 0.00 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Bmw 225xe iPerformance maxes out at 202 km/h while the Bmw 320d keeps accelerating towards 240 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.25 s.
Around 403 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Bmw 225xe iPerformance overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 38 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 225xe iPerformance finishes in 26.93 s versus 27.60 s. The 0.67 s delta in favour of the Bmw 225xe iPerformance shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 225xe iPerformance is capped at 202 km/h, the Bmw 320d at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.30 seconds. The 0.03 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 225xe iPerformance F44 gagne (6,80 s vs 6,83 s).
225xe iPerformance F44 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,80 secondes (simulation calibrée).
225xe iPerformance F44 : 224 hp, ratio 7,17 kg/hp. 320d G20 : 190 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp.
225xe iPerformance F44 : 202 km/h. 320d G20 : 240 km/h.