Over 0–100 km/h, 230i Convertible F22 wins (5,86 s vs 7,76 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 230i Convertible F22 | 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,86 s−1,90 s | 7,76 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s−1,40 s | 15,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s−1,40 s | 27,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+5 km/h | 245 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,25 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,49 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 230i Convertible F22 | 4 PureTech 225 EAT8 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 2,26 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,29 s | 3,79 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,18 s | 5,98 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,86 s | 7,76 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,10 s | 9,81 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,44 s | 15,84 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 24,93 s | 26,53 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,21 s | 15,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,01 s | 27,41 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 245 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 575 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 228 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 480 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the 230i Convertible hits 100 km/h in 5.86 s versus 7.76 s for the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8. At this point, the 230i Convertible leads by 1.90 s and sits roughly 29 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 230i Convertible is doing 129 km/h against 126 km/h for the 4 PureTech 225 EAT8. The gap is 1.36 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 230i Convertible crosses the line in 14.21 s versus 15.61 s. The 1.40 s gap represents roughly 60 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 230i Convertible continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 178 km/h versus 178 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 230i Convertible finishes in 26.01 s versus 27.41 s, with a 1.40 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 245 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the 230i Convertible never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.25 kg/hp vs 6.49 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.04 seconds. The 1.90 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 230i Convertible F22 wins (5,86 s vs 7,76 s).
230i Convertible F22 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,86 seconds (calibrated simulation).
230i Convertible F22: 252 hp, ratio 6,25 kg/hp. 4 PureTech 225 EAT8: 228 hp, ratio 6,49 kg/hp.
230i Convertible F22: 250 km/h. 4 PureTech 225 EAT8: 245 km/h.