Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 gagne (6,83 s vs 7,79 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A5 Sedan | 320d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,79 s | 6,83 s+0,96 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 14,96 s+0,78 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,63 s | 27,60 s+1,03 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 242 km/h+2 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,92 kg/hp | 8,11 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A5 Sedan | 320d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,83 s | 1,25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,04 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,46 s | 4,65 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,79 s | 6,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,74 s | 9,65 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,81 s | 17,86 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 34,87 s | 32,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,74 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,63 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 820 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 320d | |
| Gearbox | eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 320d hits 100 km/h in 6.83 s versus 7.79 s for the A5 Sedan. At this point, the Bmw 320d leads by 0.96 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d is doing 120 km/h against 117 km/h for the A5 Sedan. The gap is 0.68 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d crosses the line in 14.95 s versus 15.74 s. The 0.78 s gap represents roughly 31 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 166 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d finishes in 27.60 s versus 28.62 s, with a 1.03 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (242 vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the A5 Sedan and the Bmw 320d are governed to 242 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.92 kg/hp vs 8.11 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.41 seconds. The 0.96 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d G20 gagne (6,83 s vs 7,79 s).
A5 Sedan passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,79 secondes (simulation calibrée).
A5 Sedan : 204 hp, ratio 8,92 kg/hp. 320d G20 : 190 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp.
A5 Sedan : 242 km/h. 320d G20 : 240 km/h.