Over 0–100 km/h, 330d F30 wins (5,40 s vs 7,31 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 330d F30 | CLA 220 Limousine | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,40 s−1,91 s | 7,31 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,72 s−1,60 s | 15,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,01 s−2,53 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+10 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,78 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,08 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 330d F30 | CLA 220 Limousine |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,78 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 3,00 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,90 s | 5,21 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,40 s | 7,31 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,31 s | 9,81 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,66 s | 16,96 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,37 s | 28,48 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,72 s | 15,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,01 s | 27,54 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 560 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 380 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 705 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the 330d hits 100 km/h in 5.40 s versus 7.31 s for the CLA 220 Limousine. At this point, the 330d leads by 1.91 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 330d is doing 134 km/h against 122 km/h for the CLA 220 Limousine. The gap is 1.13 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 330d crosses the line in 13.71 s versus 15.32 s. The 1.61 s gap represents roughly 66 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 330d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 171 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 330d finishes in 25.01 s versus 27.53 s, with a 2.53 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
The 330d features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the CLA 220 Limousine’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 330d is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the CLA 220 Limousine at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.78 kg/hp vs 8.08 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.41 seconds. The 1.91 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 330d F30 wins (5,40 s vs 7,31 s).
330d F30 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,40 seconds (calibrated simulation).
330d F30: 258 hp, ratio 6,78 kg/hp. CLA 220 Limousine: 211 hp, ratio 8,08 kg/hp.
330d F30: 250 km/h. CLA 220 Limousine: 240 km/h.