Sur 0–100 km/h, 330e G20 gagne (5,91 s vs 6,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell W206 | 330e G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,36 s | 5,91 s+0,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,52 s | 14,10 s+0,42 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,36 s | 25,24 s+1,12 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 232 km/h+2 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,14 kg/hp | 6,06 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell W206 | 330e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,62 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,05 s | 2,70 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,32 s | 4,39 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,36 s | 5,91 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,09 s | 7,80 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,62 s | 12,96 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 24,37 s | 20,88 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,52 s | 14,10 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,36 s | 25,24 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 235 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 770 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 330e | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 330e hits 100 km/h in 5.91 s versus 6.36 s for the C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell. Despite the faster sprint time, the C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell is 7 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 330e is doing 134 km/h against 122 km/h for the C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell. The gap is 0.01 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 330e crosses the line in 14.09 s versus 14.52 s. The 0.43 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 330e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 188 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 330e finishes in 25.24 s versus 26.36 s, with a 1.12 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (232 vs 230 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell and the Bmw 330e are governed to 232 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.14 kg/hp vs 6.06 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.56 seconds. The 0.45 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 330e G20 gagne (5,91 s vs 6,36 s).
C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell W206 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,36 secondes (simulation calibrée).
C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell W206 : 313 hp, ratio 7,14 kg/hp. 330e G20 : 292 hp, ratio 6,06 kg/hp.
C 300 de 4MATIC T-Modell W206 : 232 km/h. 330e G20 : 230 km/h.