Over 0–100 km/h, 296 GTS wins (2,95 s vs 7,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 296 GTS | 420d F32 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,95 s−4,09 s | 7,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,39 s−4,72 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,79 s−8,99 s | 27,78 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 330 km/h+90 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,48 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 296 GTS | 420d F32 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,87 s | 1,37 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,46 s | 2,40 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,34 s | 4,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,95 s | 7,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,67 s | 9,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,56 s | 18,13 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,20 s | 33,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,39 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,79 s | 27,78 s |
| Top speed | 330 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 620 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 740 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 605 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the 296 GTS hits 100 km/h in 2.95 s versus 7.04 s for the Bmw 420d. The instant torque of 740 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the 296 GTS leads by 4.09 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 296 GTS is doing 181 km/h against 119 km/h for the Bmw 420d. The gap is 2.86 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 296 GTS crosses the line in 10.39 s versus 15.10 s. The 4.71 s gap represents roughly 178 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 296 GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 251 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 296 GTS finishes in 18.79 s versus 27.77 s, with a 8.99 s lead.
Electronically capped at 240 km/h, the Bmw 420d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.60 seconds. The 4.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 296 GTS wins (2,95 s vs 7,04 s).
296 GTS goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 2,95 seconds (calibrated simulation).
296 GTS: 620 hp, ratio 2,48 kg/hp. 420d F32: 190 hp, ratio 8,45 kg/hp.
296 GTS: 330 km/h. 420d F32: 240 km/h.