Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast wins (2,93 s vs 7,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 812 Superfast | 420d F32 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,93 s−4,11 s | 7,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,38 s−4,73 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,82 s−8,96 s | 27,78 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 327 km/h+87 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 1,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 812 Superfast | 420d F32 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,85 s | 1,37 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,43 s | 2,40 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,29 s | 4,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,93 s | 7,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,64 s | 9,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,54 s | 18,13 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,29 s | 33,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,38 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,82 s | 27,78 s |
| Top speed | 327 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 799 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 718 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 605 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the 812 Superfast hits 100 km/h in 2.93 s versus 7.04 s for the Bmw 420d. At this point, the 812 Superfast leads by 4.11 s and sits roughly 16 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 812 Superfast is doing 182 km/h against 119 km/h for the Bmw 420d. The gap is 2.90 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 812 Superfast crosses the line in 10.37 s versus 15.10 s. The 4.73 s gap represents roughly 178 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 812 Superfast continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 249 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 812 Superfast finishes in 18.81 s versus 27.77 s, with a 8.96 s lead.
Electronically capped at 240 km/h, the Bmw 420d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (1.91 kg/hp vs 8.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.60 seconds. The 4.11 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast wins (2,93 s vs 7,04 s).
812 Superfast goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 2,93 seconds (calibrated simulation).
812 Superfast: 799 hp, ratio 1,91 kg/hp. 420d F32: 190 hp, ratio 8,45 kg/hp.
812 Superfast: 327 km/h. 420d F32: 240 km/h.