Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayman 981 gagne (5,52 s vs 7,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayman 981 | 420d G22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,52 s−1,52 s | 7,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,64 s−1,47 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,69 s−3,09 s | 27,78 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 253 km/h+13 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,70 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayman 981 | 420d G22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,37 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,30 s | 2,40 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,02 s | 4,80 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,52 s | 7,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,16 s | 9,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,01 s | 18,13 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,90 s | 33,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,64 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,69 s | 27,78 s |
| Top speed | 253 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 279 hp | Aluminum block and heads |
| Torque | 289 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 310 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 605 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Cayman hits 100 km/h in 5.52 s versus 7.04 s for the Bmw 420d. At this point, the Cayman leads by 1.52 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayman is doing 136 km/h against 119 km/h for the Bmw 420d. The gap is 0.77 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayman crosses the line in 13.64 s versus 15.10 s. The 1.46 s gap represents roughly 59 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayman continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayman finishes in 24.68 s versus 27.77 s, with a 3.09 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (253 vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 240 km/h, the Bmw 420d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.70 kg/hp vs 8.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.60 seconds. The 1.52 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayman 981 gagne (5,52 s vs 7,04 s).
Cayman 981 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,52 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Cayman 981 : 279 hp, ratio 4,70 kg/hp. 420d G22 : 190 hp, ratio 8,45 kg/hp.
Cayman 981 : 253 km/h. 420d G22 : 240 km/h.