Over 0–100 km/h, 420i F32 and 420i G22 are neck and neck (7,44 s vs 7,44 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 420i F32 | 420i G22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,44 s | 7,44 s+0,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,38 s | 15,38 s+0,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,23 s | 28,23 s+0,00 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 238 km/h | 238 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,29 kg/hp | 8,29 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 420i F32 | 420i G22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,42 s | 1,42 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,53 s | 2,53 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,09 s | 5,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,44 s | 7,44 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,39 s | 10,39 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,05 s | 19,05 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 35,17 s | 35,17 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,38 s | 15,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,23 s | 28,23 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h | 238 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 420i hits 100 km/h in 7.44 s versus 7.44 s for the Bmw 420i. The 0.00 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 420i is doing 117 km/h against 117 km/h for the Bmw 420i. The gap is 0.00 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 420i crosses the line in 15.38 s versus 15.38 s. The 0.00 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory - both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.00 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere - range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw 420i and the Bmw 420i are governed to 240 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.29 kg/hp vs 8.29 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.15 seconds. The 0.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 420i F32 and 420i G22 are neck and neck (7,44 s vs 7,44 s, no significant gap).
420i F32 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,44 seconds (calibrated simulation).
420i F32: 184 hp, ratio 8,29 kg/hp. 420i G22: 184 hp, ratio 8,29 kg/hp.
420i F32: 238 km/h. 420i G22: 238 km/h.