Over 0–100 km/h, 520e G30 wins (7,75 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 520e G30 | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,75 s−0,60 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,64 s−0,55 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,03 s−0,38 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 220 km/h+5 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,00 kg/hp | 8,74 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 520e G30 | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,48 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,17 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,75 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,11 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,48 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,10 s | 45,14 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 15,64 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,03 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 835 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Bmw 520e hits 100 km/h in 7.75 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. The instant torque of 350 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Bmw 520e leads by 0.60 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 520e is doing 114 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.61 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 520e crosses the line in 15.64 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.55 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The E-PACE P200 maxes out at 215 km/h while the Bmw 520e keeps accelerating towards 220 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.48 s.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 520e finishes in 29.03 s versus 29.41 s, with just 0.38 s to spare. The E-PACE P200 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 520e is capped at 225 km/h, the E-PACE P200 at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 0.60 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 520e G30 wins (7,75 s vs 8,35 s).
520e G30 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,75 seconds (calibrated simulation).
520e G30: 204 hp, ratio 9,00 kg/hp. E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
520e G30: 220 km/h. E-PACE P200: 215 km/h.