Over 0–100 km/h, 740e iPerformance G11 wins (5,49 s vs 5,60 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 740e iPerformance G11 | 530d G30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,49 s−0,11 s | 5,60 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s−0,21 s | 13,90 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,90 s−0,39 s | 25,29 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,83 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,15 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 740e iPerformance G11 | 530d G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,27 s | 1,38 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,12 s | 2,25 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,79 s | 3,98 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,49 s | 5,60 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,38 s | 7,64 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,61 s | 13,26 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,69 s | 21,99 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s | 13,90 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,90 s | 25,29 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 760 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 740e iPerformance hits 100 km/h in 5.49 s versus 5.60 s for the Bmw 530d. The instant torque of 400 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Bmw 740e iPerformance leads by 0.11 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 740e iPerformance is doing 133 km/h against 132 km/h for the Bmw 530d. The gap is 0.14 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 740e iPerformance crosses the line in 13.68 s versus 13.90 s. The 0.22 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 740e iPerformance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 187 km/h versus 184 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 740e iPerformance finishes in 24.90 s versus 25.29 s, with a 0.39 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw 740e iPerformance and the Bmw 530d are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.83 seconds. The 0.11 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 740e iPerformance G11 wins (5,49 s vs 5,60 s).
740e iPerformance G11 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,49 seconds (calibrated simulation).
740e iPerformance G11: 326 hp, ratio 5,83 kg/hp. 530d G30: 286 hp, ratio 6,15 kg/hp.
740e iPerformance G11: 250 km/h. 530d G30: 250 km/h.