Sur 0–100 km/h, 745e G11 gagne (5,16 s vs 5,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 745e G11 | 740Le iPerformance G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,16 s−0,42 s | 5,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,37 s−0,40 s | 13,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,08 s−0,97 s | 25,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,08 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 745e G11 | 740Le iPerformance G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,29 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,29 s | 2,14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,80 s | 3,85 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,16 s | 5,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,84 s | 7,52 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,35 s | 12,85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,09 s | 21,11 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,37 s | 13,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,08 s | 25,05 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 940 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 745e hits 100 km/h in 5.16 s versus 5.58 s for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. The 0.42 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 745e is doing 139 km/h against 132 km/h for the Bmw 740Le iPerformance. The gap is 0.17 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 745e crosses the line in 13.37 s versus 13.77 s. The 0.40 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 745e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 745e finishes in 24.07 s versus 25.05 s, with a 0.97 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw 745e and the Bmw 740Le iPerformance are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.08 kg/hp vs 5.95 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.68 seconds. The 0.42 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 745e G11 gagne (5,16 s vs 5,58 s).
745e G11 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,16 secondes (simulation calibrée).
745e G11 : 394 hp, ratio 5,08 kg/hp. 740Le iPerformance G11 : 326 hp, ratio 5,95 kg/hp.
745e G11 : 250 km/h. 740Le iPerformance G11 : 250 km/h.