Over 0–100 km/h, 745e G11 wins (5,16 s vs 8,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 745e G11 | XC40 B4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,16 s−3,07 s | 8,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,37 s−2,74 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,08 s−5,31 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+70 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,08 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,17 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 745e G11 | XC40 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,29 s | 3,12 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,80 s | 5,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,16 s | 8,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,84 s | 11,35 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,35 s | 21,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,09 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13,37 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,08 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
Off the line, the Bmw 745e hits 100 km/h in 5.16 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. The instant torque of 600 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Bmw 745e leads by 3.07 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 745e is doing 139 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 1.74 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 745e crosses the line in 13.37 s versus 16.10 s. The 2.73 s gap represents roughly 103 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 745e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 745e finishes in 24.07 s versus 29.39 s, with a 5.31 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 745e is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the XC40 B4 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 3.07 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 745e G11 wins (5,16 s vs 8,23 s).
745e G11 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,16 seconds (calibrated simulation).
745e G11: 394 hp, ratio 5,08 kg/hp. XC40 B4: 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp.
745e G11: 250 km/h. XC40 B4: 180 km/h.