Over 0–100 km/h, 840i Convertible G15 wins (5,36 s vs 5,86 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 840i Convertible G15 | 230i Convertible F22 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,36 s−0,50 s | 5,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,59 s−0,62 s | 14,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,56 s−1,45 s | 26,01 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,38 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,25 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 840i Convertible G15 | 230i Convertible F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,38 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,33 s | 2,29 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,91 s | 4,18 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,36 s | 5,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,12 s | 8,10 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,98 s | 14,44 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,49 s | 24,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,59 s | 14,21 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,56 s | 26,01 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 830 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 575 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the 840i Convertible hits 100 km/h in 5.36 s versus 5.86 s for the 230i Convertible. At this point, the 840i Convertible leads by 0.50 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 840i Convertible is doing 137 km/h against 129 km/h for the 230i Convertible. The gap is 0.30 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 840i Convertible crosses the line in 13.59 s versus 14.21 s. The 0.62 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the 840i Convertible continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 178 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 840i Convertible finishes in 24.56 s versus 26.01 s, with a 1.45 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the 840i Convertible and the 230i Convertible are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.38 kg/hp vs 6.25 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.32 seconds. The 0.50 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 840i Convertible G15 wins (5,36 s vs 5,86 s).
840i Convertible G15 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,36 seconds (calibrated simulation).
840i Convertible G15: 340 hp, ratio 5,38 kg/hp. 230i Convertible F22: 252 hp, ratio 6,25 kg/hp.
840i Convertible G15: 250 km/h. 230i Convertible F22: 250 km/h.