Over 0–100 km/h, 840i Convertible G15 wins (5,40 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 840i Convertible G15 | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,40 s−2,95 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s−2,56 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,63 s−4,78 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+35 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,53 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 840i Convertible G15 | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,93 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,40 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,19 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,11 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,66 s | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,63 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 840 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Bmw 840i Convertible hits 100 km/h in 5.40 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Bmw 840i Convertible leads by 2.95 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 840i Convertible is doing 136 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 1.67 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 840i Convertible crosses the line in 13.63 s versus 16.19 s. The 2.56 s gap represents roughly 97 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 840i Convertible continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 840i Convertible finishes in 24.62 s versus 29.41 s, with a 4.79 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 840i Convertible is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the E-PACE P200 at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.53 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 2.95 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 840i Convertible G15 wins (5,40 s vs 8,35 s).
840i Convertible G15 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,40 seconds (calibrated simulation).
840i Convertible G15: 333 hp, ratio 5,53 kg/hp. E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
840i Convertible G15: 250 km/h. E-PACE P200: 215 km/h.