Sur 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 gagne (6,12 s vs 7,03 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i5 eDrive40 G60 | 320d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s−0,91 s | 7,03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s−0,83 s | 15,13 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s−1,37 s | 27,24 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 240 km/h−47 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,63 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i5 eDrive40 G60 | 320d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,79 s | 1,81 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,98 s | 3,00 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,78 s | 5,11 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 7,03 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,84 s | 9,49 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,27 s | 16,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 28,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 15,13 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 27,24 s |
| Top speed | 193 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 130 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 450 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
Off the line, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 hits 100 km/h in 6.12 s versus 7.03 s for the Bmw 320d. The instant torque of 400 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 leads by 0.91 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 is doing 135 km/h against 123 km/h for the Bmw 320d. The gap is 0.44 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 crosses the line in 14.29 s versus 15.13 s. The 0.84 s gap represents roughly 35 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 173 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 finishes in 25.87 s versus 27.23 s, with a 1.37 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (240 km/h), the Bmw 320d never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw i5 eDrive40 is capped at 193 km/h, the Bmw 320d at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.96 seconds. The 0.91 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 gagne (6,12 s vs 7,03 s).
i5 eDrive40 G60 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,12 secondes (simulation calibrée).
i5 eDrive40 G60 : 313 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. 320d G20 : 190 hp, ratio 7,63 kg/hp.
i5 eDrive40 G60 : 193 km/h. 320d G20 : 240 km/h.