Sur 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 gagne (6,12 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i5 eDrive40 G60 | DS9 E-Tense 250 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s−2,24 s | 8,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s−1,92 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s−2,70 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 235 km/h−42 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,51 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i5 eDrive40 G60 | DS9 E-Tense 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,79 s | 2,40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,98 s | 4,01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,78 s | 6,47 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 8,36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,84 s | 10,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,27 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 31,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed | 193 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 130 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 hits 100 km/h in 6.12 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. At this point, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 leads by 2.24 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 is doing 135 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 1.44 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 crosses the line in 14.29 s versus 16.22 s. The 1.92 s gap represents roughly 79 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 finishes in 25.87 s versus 28.57 s, with a 2.70 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (235 km/h), the DS9 E-Tense 250 never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 193 km/h, the Bmw i5 eDrive40 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.81 kg/hp vs 7.51 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 2.24 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 gagne (6,12 s vs 8,36 s).
i5 eDrive40 G60 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,12 secondes (simulation calibrée).
i5 eDrive40 G60 : 313 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. DS9 E-Tense 250 : 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp.
i5 eDrive40 G60 : 193 km/h. DS9 E-Tense 250 : 235 km/h.