Among the 43 grand tourers plug-in hybrid 2019–2023, the DS9 E-Tense 250 ranks 3rd of 15 in Electric WLTP range (55 km, behind the Bmw 530e), 43th of 43 in Combined range (55 km, behind the Bmw 520d), 10th of 15 in Thermal cons. estimated (6.2 L/100, behind the Bmw 530e), 41th of 43 in 0–100 km/h (8.2 s, behind the Bmw 540d xDrive).
DS9 E-Tense 250
253 hp, 55 km electric range, 8,2 s 0-100 : among the 43 grand tourers plug-in hybrid 2019–2023, the DS9 E-Tense 250 ranks 3rd of 15 in Electric WLTP range, 43th of 43 in Combined range, 10th of 15 in Thermal cons. estimated, 41th of 43 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
253hp
520 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
8.2s
VMax 230 km/h
Electric range
55km
WLTP
Battery + Tank
11.5kWh
+ 0 L tank
Full specifications DS DS9 E-Tense 250
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Power | 253 hp |
| Couple | 520 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 11.5 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 55 km |
| Charge AC max | 7.4 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 17.5 kWh/100km |
| Petrol cons. WLTP | 1.9 L/100km |
| Conso thermique | 6.2 L/100km |
| EV range motorway | 61 km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 8,2 s |
| VMax | 230 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 1,900 kg |
| Cd | 0.28 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 43 grand tourers plug-in hybrid, the DS9 E-Tense 250 combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use (top 3 in segment), a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the DS9 E-Tense 250 through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
grand tourer plug-in hybrid among the best in segment: 3rd of 15 in Electric WLTP range (55 km).
Very long trips without stopping. With 55 km combined range, expect more frequent refuelling than other PHEVs in the segment.
If the priority is Electric WLTP range, the Bmw 530e (1st with 62 km) takes the lead. If the priority is Combined range, the Bmw 520d (1st with 1535 km) takes the lead.
In the city: 55 km pure electric (top 3 in segment)
With a full battery, the DS9 E-Tense 250 drives in pure electric mode for the first 55 km WLTP - placing it 3rd of 15 in Electric WLTP range, behind the Bmw 530e (62 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the DS9 E-Tense 250 behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the DS9 E-Tense 250 stands against grand tourers plug-in hybrid
Comparison across 43 grand tourers plug-in hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the DS9 E-Tense 250
DS DS9 E-Tense 250: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
55 km WLTP announced - making it the 3rd of 15 in autonomie du segment out of 15 models. The reference is the Bmw 530e (62 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw 530e leads in Electric WLTP range (62 km vs 55 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the DS9 E-Tense 250 vs Bmw 530e duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.