Over 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 wins (3,71 s vs 3,86 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX M60 I20 | Han EV AWD 380kW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s−0,15 s | 3,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s−0,11 s | 12,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s−2,20 s | 24,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+70 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,26 kg/hp | 4,22 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX M60 I20 | Han EV AWD 380kW |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 1,10 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 1,83 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 2,94 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s | 3,86 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,03 s | 5,02 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,60 s | 8,48 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,69 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s | 12,05 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s | 24,05 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 517 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction AWD |
Off the line, the iX M60 hits 100 km/h in 3.72 s versus 3.86 s for the Han EV AWD 380kW. At this point, the iX M60 leads by 0.15 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the iX M60 is doing 151 km/h against 154 km/h for the Han EV AWD 380kW. The gap is 0.13 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the iX M60 crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 12.05 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 6 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the iX M60 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 180 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX M60 finishes in 21.84 s versus 24.04 s, with a 2.20 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX M60 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Han EV AWD 380kW at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.26 kg/hp vs 4.22 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.80 seconds. The 0.15 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 wins (3,71 s vs 3,86 s).
iX M60 I20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,71 seconds (calibrated simulation).
iX M60 I20: 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp. Han EV AWD 380kW: 517 hp, ratio 4,22 kg/hp.
iX M60 I20: 250 km/h. Han EV AWD 380kW: 180 km/h.