Sur 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 gagne (3,71 s vs 4,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX M60 I20 | I-PACE EV400 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s−1,12 s | 4,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s−1,25 s | 13,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s−2,51 s | 24,36 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+50 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,26 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,52 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX M60 I20 | I-PACE EV400 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 3,62 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,71 s | 4,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,03 s | 6,40 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,60 s | 11,23 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,69 s | 18,88 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s | 13,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,85 s | 24,36 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 619 hp | |
| Torque | 1100 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 640 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed reduction gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | |
| Torque | 696 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 208 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the iX M60 hits 100 km/h in 3.72 s versus 4.84 s for the I-PACE EV400. At this point, the iX M60 leads by 1.12 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the iX M60 is doing 151 km/h against 141 km/h for the I-PACE EV400. The gap is 0.89 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the iX M60 crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 13.18 s. The 1.24 s gap represents roughly 58 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the iX M60 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 192 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the iX M60 finishes in 21.84 s versus 24.36 s, with a 2.51 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX M60 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the I-PACE EV400 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.26 kg/hp vs 5.52 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.37 seconds. The 1.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, iX M60 I20 gagne (3,71 s vs 4,83 s).
iX M60 I20 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,71 secondes (simulation calibrée).
iX M60 I20 : 619 hp, ratio 4,26 kg/hp. I-PACE EV400 : 400 hp, ratio 5,52 kg/hp.
iX M60 I20 : 250 km/h. I-PACE EV400 : 200 km/h.