I-PACE EV400
400 hp, 470 km range, 4,8 s 0-100 : among the 5 D-SUV electric 2017–2021, the I-PACE EV400 ranks WLTP range, 3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h, behind the only Ford Mustang Mach-E GT. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
400hp
696 Nm · 400 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
4.8s
VMax 200 km/h
Range
470km
WLTP
DC charging
—kW
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Jaguar I-PACE EV400
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Puissance électrique | 400 hp |
| Combined power | 400 hp |
| Couple | 696 Nm |
| Gearbox | REDUCER_2SPEED Automatic |
| Transmission | I-PACE EV400 2019 |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 84.7 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 470 km |
| Conso élec WLTP | 18,0 kWh/100km |
| Cons. WLTP | 18,0 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,8 s |
| VMax | 200 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,682 mm |
| Width | 1,895 mm |
| Height | 1,565 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,208 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 5 D-SUV electric, the I-PACE EV400 ranks in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is WLTP range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT (1st with 490 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT (1st with 3.7 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 470 km WLTP (WLTP range)
The I-PACE EV400 offers 470 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT (490 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Segment positioning
Where the I-PACE EV400 stands against D-SUV electric
Comparison across 5 D-SUV electric marketed between 2017–2021.
WLTP range
2eout of 2
0–100 km/h
3eout of 5
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Model Y Long Range AWD
384 hp · 0-100 5.0 s
Model Y Long Range AWD
384 hp · 0-100 5.0 s
Model Y Long Range AWD
384 hp · 0-100 5.0 s
Model Y Long Range AWD
384 hp · 0-100 5.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the I-PACE EV400
Take the next step
Find a I-PACE EV400 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Jaguar I-PACE EV400: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 5 D-SUV electric 2017–2021, the I-PACE EV400 ranks WLTP range (470 km, behind the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT), 3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h (4.8 s, behind the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT).
470 km WLTP announced — making it the autonomie du segment out of 2 models. The reference is the Ford Mustang Mach-E GT (490 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Ford Mustang Mach-E GT leads in WLTP range (490 km vs 470 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the I-PACE EV400 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E GT duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.